Progressive Religious Groups Weigh in on Health Care Reform: Call with Obama, TV Ads

Robert Jones on August 17, 2009

I wanted everyone in the Public Religion Research community to know about an several ways that the religious community is speaking out in support of health care reform and about a unique opportunity to participate in a national call with President Obama.

Invitation: President Obama call with America’s Faith Community

Most prominently, President Obama has accepted an invitation to participate in a nationwide call-in about health care reform with America’s faith community. Everyone is welcome to listen-in on this call.

The call is part of “40 Days for Health Reform,” a coordinated effort by a range of religious groups to ensure that Congress passes reform legislation that extends quality, affordable health care to every American family. President Obama will join key religious leaders and people of faith across America on a call in and audio webcast on health care reform on August 19 at 5:00 p.m. ET. The call and “40 Days for Health Reform” is sponsored by an unprecedented coalition of more than 25 religious denominations and organizations who work for social justice and the common good. More information about the call is available at faithforhealth.org.

What: Nationwide Call-in with President Obama on Health Care Reform

Who’s Invited: You

When: Wednesday, August 19, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time

How to call in: Visit faithforhealth.org to register and receive call-in information.

Jews for Health Care Reform

The Jewish community is also raising a distinctively Jewish voice for universal, affordable, accessible health care.  The new site, www.jewsforhealthcarereform.org, calls on Jews to “get in the game” and outlines the motivation for Jews to be involved in the debate:

Because we care for justice, and a system that leaves millions of us uninsured and millions more underinsured is not just. Jewish tradition teaches that an individual human life is of infinite value and its preservation supersedes almost all other considerations. It’s that simple, and that crucial.

The effort is sponsored by the Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism (The RAC) and contains a petition, a guide to the health care debate, and other resources. Here’s Rabbi David Saperstein, Director of the RAC, talking about the religious imperative to extend health care to “all of God’s children.”

New National Television Ad Supporting Health Care Reform from a Religious Perspective

You can also check out a new national television ad featuring local evangelical, Catholic, and mainline pastors, and people of faith talking about the connection between their religious beliefs and health care reform. The ad is sponsored by Faithful America, PICO National Network, Sojourners, and Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

National Health Care Sermon Weekend

Finally, “40 Days for Health Care Reform” will include the weekend of August 28-30 as National Health Care Sermon Weekend.  On this weekend, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, and other clergy will preach about health care reform from the perspectives of their religious traditions in congregations nationwide.

All of these events are clear indicators that progressive religious leaders and organizations are finding their voice and speaking out in powerful ways to challenge our leaders to work for basic justice for all and to be a force for healing not only for a broken health care system but for a broken world.

Petition Christianity Today to Tell the Truth and Retract Misleading “Mandating Euthanasia” Article

Robert Jones on August 12, 2009

Join me in calling on Christianity Today to retract its misleading and fear-mongering article about health care reform entitled Mandating Euthansia? by Rob Moll.

UPDATE: As a result of our petitions, CT has changed the title to “Will Section 1233 Hasten Patient Deaths?”—not as inflammatory, but the piece still gives credence to Sekulow’s dubious arguments (see below). Also, the editors censored my comments about the article below from their comment stream—so much for free discussion. Let’s tell them that a full retraction, and not simply a title change, is what truth-telling demands.

Two ways to act:

  1. You can act by signing and retweeting our Twitter petition to your lists.
  2. Add your comments on the Christianity Today site calling on the article to be fully retracted with an apology for the misleading information.

Here’s my comment about the article:

THE ONLY THING TO SAY ABOUT THIS PIECE IS THAT IT SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY RETRACTED. Although I don’t always agree with CT pieces, I’ve most often respected them as thoughtful, honest, trustworthy discussions of important issues of our day—until this. Since when did CT become the mouthpiece for Pat Robertson affiliated Jay Sekulow? Repeating Sekulow’s dubious arguments—“In the context of cutting costs, Section 1233 looks more like the government is asking doctors to do the dirty work of ‘bending the curve’ of health care costs by convincing the elderly to forego medical care”—is shameful.

As others have pointed out here, Rob Moll is either ignorant of basic facts on the subjects he’s writing about (e.g., hospice/palliative care does not equal euthanasia; hospice has Christian roots and is committed to neither hastening nor prolonging death) or he’s willfully obscurring distinctions for political purposes and headline grandstanding. Either way, it’s a culpable, deeply disappointing approach from a source I typically trust. The only way to honor basic truth-telling and journalistic integrity here would be to offer an apology and full retraction.

We have serious issues to discuss on health care, and we need to be able to rely on our religious leaders and leading religious magazines for truth-telling and integrity. Call on Christianity Today to restore integrity to its coverage of health care.

Robert P. Jones, Ph.D.
President, Public Religion Research
Join us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/PublicReligion

Press Release: Survey Shows Lutheran Clergy Support Ordination of Gay and Lesbian Clergy

Dan on August 5, 2009

SURVEY SHOWS LUTHERAN CLERGY SUPPORT

ORDINATION OF GAY AND LESBIAN CLERGY

SURVEY SHOWS ELCA CLERGY SUPPORT PERFORMING SAME-SEX MARRIAGES WHERE LEGAL

Contact: Dr. Robert P. Jones, President, 202-425-0277, rjones@publicreligion.org
For the PDF version of this press release, click here.

A majority of clergy who belong to the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) support ordination of gay and lesbian clergy, and a plurality (46%) support performing same-sex marriages in states where they are legal, according to a recent national survey by Public Religion Research. The Clergy Voices Survey is the most in-depth study ever conducted of Mainline Protestant clergy and contained nearly 60 questions related to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) issues in the church and society.

“ELCA clergy are generally supportive of a range of rights for gay and lesbian people both inside and outside the church. Nationwide, a majority of ELCA clergy support ordaining gay and lesbian clergy, and only a minority of ELCA clergy opposes performing same-sex marriages in the states where they are legal,” said Dr. Robert P. Jones, President of Public Religion Research, who conducted the study. “ELCA clergy also strongly believe that the gospel message requires full inclusion of gay and lesbian members in the life of the church, and support for ordination and participation in marriage ceremonies of gay and lesbian parishioners are concrete expressions of that theological conviction.”

Seven-in-ten ELCA clergy say that the gospel message requires full inclusion of LGBT people in the church, and a majority of ELCA clergy supports ordination of gay and lesbian clergy . A solid majority (54%) of ELCA clergy says that gay and lesbian people should be eligible for ordination with no special requirements. About one-third (32%) says that gay and lesbian people should be eligible for ordination only if they are celibate, and only 14% say gay and lesbian people should not be eligible at all.

A plurality of ELCA clergy support performing civil marriages where legal. By a significant margin, ELCA clergy disagree with the statement, “Even if it were legal, I would not be willing to perform a civil union or marriage for a same-sex couple” (46% disagree vs. 37% agree). As a matter of public policy, the overwhelming majority of ELCA clergy support either same-sex marriage (37%) or civil unions (44%), and only 1-in-5 (19%) says there should be no legal recognition for same-sex relationships. ELCA clergy are also strongly supportive of other rights for LGBT families and individuals, such as adoption rights, hate crimes laws, and workplace discrimination protections.

A majority (53%) of ELCA clergy report that their views on LGBT issues are more liberal today than they were a decade ago. One-third (33%) says their views have not changed, and only 14% say they have become more conservative.

The Clergy Voices Survey was conducted by mail among a national random sample of senior clergy serving congregations in the seven largest Mainline Protestant denominations. The survey contained over 250 separate questions and generated 2,658 respondents with a response rate of 44%. The findings represent the opinions of senior Lutheran clergy currently serving congregations. The study included a national random sample of 387 Lutheran clergy with a margin of error +/- 5.5%. The Clergy Voices Survey was funded by the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund. Full results of the study, including a full top line questionnaire and detailed methodology, can be found at http://www.publicreligion.org/research/?id=208.

# # #

Press Release: Survey Shows PCUSA Clergy Support Legal Recognition of Gay Couples’ Relationships

Dan on August 4, 2009

SURVEY SHOWS PRESBYTERIAN (USA) CLERGY SUPPORT LEGAL RECOGNITION OF GAY COUPLES’ RELATIONSHIPS, ORDINATION OF GAY AND LESBIAN CLERGY

SUPPORT CHURCH DOING MORE TO HELP MEMBERS CONSIDER GAY AND LESBIAN ISSUES

Contact: Dr. Robert P. Jones, President, 202-425-0277, rjones@publicreligion.org

For the PDF version of this press release, click here.

In recent years, the Presbyterian Church (USA) has been debating a number of policies related to the place of gay and lesbian people in society and in church life. The 2008 General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) authorized the formation of a special committee to study the place of covenanted same-gender partnerships in the Christian community. The committee is currently collecting opinion from members and clergy on this important issue.

This release reflects findings from the 2008 Clergy Voices Survey (CVS). CVS, conducted by Public Religion Research, is the largest public opinion survey of Mainline Protestant clergy ever conducted. Because of the prominence of debates over gay and lesbian issues in Mainline Protestant denominational meetings in recent years, CVS included nearly 60 questions on gay and lesbian issues related to both public policy and church policy. The findings below represent the opinions of Presbyterian senior clergy currently serving congregations. The study included a national random sample of 411 PCUSA clergy; the Research Services Office of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) provided the sample.

Gay and Lesbian Members, Conversations about LGBT Issues in Church

Nearly two-thirds (64%) of PCUSA clergy report that they have lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) members in their congregations. Only 1-in-10 (11%) reports that they are not aware of LGBT members, and one-fourth says that they do not know.

Like other Mainline Protestant clergy, the vast majority of PCUSA clergy (96%) say that LGBT persons are welcome in their church. However, there is less consensus about whether “welcome” is equivalent to “full inclusion.” A strong but smaller majority (61%) of PCUSA clergy agrees that the gospel message requires the full inclusion of LGBT people in the church, while slightly less than a third (30%) disagree.

A strong majority (58%) of PCUSA clergy thinks that their church should do more to help members think carefully about LGBT issues. However, a majority (54%) also reports that their congregation has difficulty talking about LGBT issues. Barriers to better conversations are both theological and practical. On the one hand, there is considerable diversity of opinion among clergy on basic issues such as whether the Bible addresses what we understand today as sexual orientation; a majority (53%) says it does not, while 42% affirm that it does. On the other hand, clergy are weighing pastoral concerns. Clergy report that the top two barriers to having conversations about LGBT issues are concerns about creating divisions within the congregation (38%) and congregational discomfort with sexuality issues in general (31%).

Gay and Lesbian Church Leadership

PCUSA clergy strongly support LGBT persons in lay leadership roles, and generally support the ordination of gay and lesbian clergy with some caveats. Nearly two-thirds (66%) of PCUSA clergy agree with the statement, “Qualified LGBT persons should be eligible for lay leadership positions in our church,” compared to 29% who disagree (Note: The survey did not distinguish between ordained and non-ordained lay leadership positions).

Half of PCUSA clergy favor ordaining lesbian and gay clergy without any special requirements, and an additional one-third supports the ordination of lesbian and gay clergy only if they are celibate. Only 15% oppose the ordination of lesbian and gay persons under any circumstances.

Marriage and Civil Unions

More than three-quarters of PCUSA clergy support some legal recognition of gay couples’ relationships. Thirty-eight percent support same-sex marriage, and 38% support civil unions for gay couples. Only about 1-in-4 (24%) say there should be no legal recognition of a gay couple’s relationship.

When clergy are offered a religious liberty reassurance that the law would guarantee that no church or congregation would be required to perform marriages for same-sex couples, support for marriage increases 14 points to majority support (52%), support for civil unions falls to 24%, and the same number say there should be no legal recognition for same-sex couples (24%).

With regard to clergy roles in same-gender relationship recognition, PCUSA clergy are divided over whether they would be willing to perform a civil union or marriage for a same-sex couple even if it were legal in their state. A plurality (49%) says that they would not be willing, compared to 44% who say they would be willing. Seven percent say they are unsure.

Adoption

Approximately 6-in-10 (61%) PCUSA clergy believe that otherwise qualified gay people should be able to adopt children. Only 1-in-4 disagrees, and 14% say they are not sure. PCUSA clergy are somewhat more supportive of adoption rights for gay and lesbian people than Mainline Protestant clergy overall.

Changing Views on LGBT Issues

More than 4-in-10 (43%) PCUSA clergy report that their views on LGBT issues have become more liberal over the past decade. Nearly an identical number (44%) report that their views have not changed over this period. Only 13% say their views have become more conservative.

About the Clergy Voices Survey

The Clergy Voices Survey (CVS) is the largest survey of Mainline Protestant clergy ever conducted. CVS was conducted by mail between March 3 and September 15, 2008, by Public Religion Research and funded by a grant from the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund. Dr. Robert P. Jones and Daniel Cox served as the principal researchers for the study. The margin of sampling error for the Presbyterian subsample is +/- 5.3%. The full report can be accessed at http://www.publicreligion.org/research/?id=208.

###